2008-10-02

On so-called "strategic voting"

Many on the progressive side of politics will be considering "strategic voting" in the federal election. Understandably, we're worried about the possibility of the most extreme right-wing (majority) government that Canada has ever seen: the Harper Conservatives. The Conservatives are taking Canada in the wrong direction: economically and socially.

Personally, I'm voting:
  1. in accordance with my core beliefs, principles, and values;
  2. to register publicly my support for a particular party, platform, and vision; and,
  3. to ensure that my party of choice gets more campaign funding next time.
For me, those are the strategic considerations: my integrity, being counted, and financial resources. As I see it, voting for any party other than NDP would be akin to voting against myself. Further, the party leader, its candidates, its campaign workers, its members, and the general public, need to see voting numbers to know that there is support for the party, its platform, and its vision; this is important on many levels. Finally, public funding for a party's election campaign is tied to the number of votes that the party received in the last election; for this reason alone, there is no such thing as a "wasted" vote.

The following commentary, on a popular blog by an Ottawa writer, provides more food for thought about "strategic voting":

"Think Twice About Voting Strategically"

Excerpt: "There is one issue I'm going to weigh in on during this election, and that's the advocacy of so-called 'strategic voting'. It's based on faulty assumptions, is frequently clumsily calculated and executed (often by people with hidden but vested interests), and most seriously: it can lead to quite perverse outcomes."

Link: http://www.punditsguide.ca/2008/09/think-twice-about-voting-strategically.php

0 comments: