
Labeling: To what end?
Re: "Straight-talking struggle," Nov. 6/10
Michael Coren is well known as an evangelical Christian. I feel confident, therefore, that he knows the Bible well and is familiar with the scapegoat story.[1] [Note: Apparently I missed the news that Michael Coren switched back to Roman Catholicism in recent years. Still Christian, but no longer evangelical.]
Thus, one might think that Coren would name scapegoating when he sees it. Instead, he lauds the jingoism and xenophobia spewed by right-wing mouthpieces like Mark Steyn.[2]
I also cherish free speech. But let's shift the debate from Steyn's speech to its effects. In uncertain times, Steyn's rants direct attention away from the economic elites who got us into the present mess. Instead, minorities and social critics take the beating--including Muslims, feminists, leftists, gays, academics, and others.
Fascism has many characteristics including, to name just a few, hyper-patriotism, labeling enemies/scapegoats, and contempt towards intellectuals and human rights.[3] Clearly we are not now living under fascism, and surely we want to avoid a drift towards that kind of viciousness and authoritarianism.
But consider Steyn's rhetoric and ask yourself: In what political direction are he and Coren trying to lead us?[4] It's a troubling drift and, in a society where free speech is not equally accessible to all[5], why is it surprising that victims of scapegoating may sometimes feel compelled to resort to censorious tactics?
Rick Telfer
(Sent November 6, 2010)
FURTHER/RELATED READING & EXAMPLES/EVIDENCE:
0 comments:
Post a Comment